![]() You download it and HAVE to pay the $39 for outputs. PS if i get a new computer and keep my imac, yes it will be easy to do it with a second machine. i'd just get a standalone program like patchwork and put it at ultra low buffer, and use a cheap multi channel interface going into the Apollo. and i could compensate with pro tools record offset very easily, as of course that won't be sample accurate.īut i really want to sell the imac and have only one desktop. PPS i suppose VEP is the answer for doing it fully integrated on the same machine, i saw a video with pro tools expert adding spectrasonics stuff to ve pro and it's not impacting pro tools performance at all.īut that's not a cheap program. I did this for years by hosting VI's in Reaper and Rewiring them into PT from the instruments individual outputs. ![]() ![]() Reaper is basically free if you don't mind a nag window. It does not make sense to say if its "single or multi threaded". Its ONLY job is get something from point "a" to point "b".ĪLL the processing done through the rewire stream is stacked onto one core. You could rewire reaper, ableton, numerology, etc into the rewire master, and all would compound and stack onto one core, including whatever plugins you use inside them. I'll take propellerheads' word on it over yours thanks very much. Why on earth did i even bother to unmute and view the post, just in case, after weeks of muting, you had written something useful. Nope, it was just an instant go at trying to correct me, um, incorrectly by the way. Just like your answers in my motherboard topic, where you didn't understand about the mmcss going to kernel level in windows 10 and being limited to 32 logical cores, so attacked my intelligence instead as a reply. Of course, i spoke to a guru at length, and he said my question in that topic was well put and a very fair question to ask.īack to mute.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |